Dossier · record
Asia Cosmetic Hospital — Nonthaburi / Greater Bangkok
33TI /100
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability —
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 3
Licence-number / credential disclosure 2
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 3
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2
Advertising honesty 1
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 2
Public-claim sourcing discipline 2
responsible doctor(s) resolved in the TMC register (active registration) · 82% verification hold · H2 🌐 www.asiacosmeticthailand.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-ASIA-COSMETIC · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability — · 10%
OFFICIAL A MOPH hospital-operating-licence number is not published on the clinic's own sites, and a MOPH-portal name search under multiple Thai spellings (เอเชียคอสเมติก) did not isolate the exact licence record as of 2026-07-11 (a search limitation, NOT an absence of licence). What is published are advertising-approval permits (ฆสพ.นบ 276/2563, ฆสพ.นบ 48/2566) — a different permit type from the operating licence. · provisional
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 3 · 24%
OFFICIAL The founder and principal surgeon Dr Tanongsak Panyawirunroj (Thai: นายแพทย์ทนงศักดิ์ ปัญญาวิรุฬห์โรจน์) is named on the clinic's own sites and resolves in the Thai Medical Council register as an active physician (registered since 1998) holding board certification in Surgery and Plastic Surgery.
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 2 · 12%
UNVERIFIED No Thai Medical Council licence number is shown for any doctor on the clinic's own sites, including the founder; his profile lists Thai Board diplomas (General Surgery 2005, Plastic Surgery 2007) with years but no ว. licence number.
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED JCI (and ISO) are claimed at hospital level on the Thai sites, but no JCI certificate, accreditation ID, valid-through date or scope document is published — whole-hospital versus specific-wing scope cannot be confirmed from the site.
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED An operating company is identifiable — Asia Cosmetic Hospital Co., Ltd. (reg. 0125557002137, registered 2014) behind the English site; the Thai site displays a different registered entity, Advanced Asia Hospital Co., Ltd., at a different address. The split feeds the verification hold.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2 · 8%
UNVERIFIED The only patient-facing document located is a Booking / Payment Agreement with financial terms (100 USD consultation fee, 30% non-refundable deposit); no informed-consent, risk-disclosure, patient-rights or privacy document was found on the crawlable sites.
M7 · Advertising honesty 1 · 12%
UNVERIFIED The English site carries the section headers «Best Plastic Surgery in Thailand» and «Most Famous Plastic Surgery», and states of its liposuction «The procedure is 100% safe and result is immediate.» Under the advertising-honesty axis, unqualified absolute-safety and superlative claims sit at the low anchor. These are recorded as wording observed on-site on 2026-07-11; the clinic's response is invited and its right of reply is open.
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — A formal per-locale (EN / TH) cross-front comparison is deferred to a dedicated locale-map pass; it is noted factually that the English and Thai sites display two different legal entities at different addresses (see M5), which is carried under the verification hold rather than scored here. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Decision-path clarity is limited — the named principal surgeon is clear, but the addresses conflict across properties (Rattanathibet Rd vs Soi Liang Muang Nonthaburi 5) and the named primary domain is dead, so which entity or site a patient is contracting with is not unambiguous.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Several superlative / comparative claims ('Best Plastic Surgery in Thailand', 'Most Famous Plastic Surgery', 'more than 10,000 cases') stand without an independent, linked source.
Editorial verdict. Asia Cosmetic Hospital is fronted by a named principal surgeon, Dr Tanongsak Panyawirunroj, who resolves in the Thai Medical Council register with board certification in Plastic Surgery — a solid spine. Against that sit three structural verifiability points recorded as observed facts: the domain named for the clinic does not resolve; its English and Thai sites present two different legal entities at different addresses; and the site carries absolute-safety and superlative wording quoted in the record. On those grounds the entry carries a material (H2) verification hold. Each point is a neutral statement of what was observed on 2026-07-11, not an allegation; the clinic's response is invited and its right of reply is open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.