Dossier · record
Privato Clinic — Asoke, Silom & Ratchaphruek (Bangkok)
54TI /100
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4
Licence-number / credential disclosure 3
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 1
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2
Advertising honesty 3
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 3
Public-claim sourcing discipline 3
responsible doctor(s) resolved in the TMC register (active registration) · 92% 🌐 privatoclinic.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-PRIVATO · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4 · 10%
OFFICIAL The MOPH (Dept. of Health Service Support) private-facility register lists พรีวาโตคลินิกเวชกรรม at Midtown Asoke building, Sukhumvit 21 (Asoke) — operating-licence no. 10101062662 — and its Silom branch (สาขาสีลม) at C.P. Tower, Thanon Silom — operating-licence no. 10101023465; both match the dossier's Bangkok addresses (the Ratchaphruek branch is also licensed, no. 12101002058). No MOPH number is published on the clinic's own site (non-disclosure is not an absence of licence).
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4 · 24%
OFFICIAL The lead doctor resolves in the TMC register: Lerpong Krudngern (นพ. เลอพงษ์ กรุดเงิน), active registration since 2003 (a registered generalist, no board specialty); seven doctors are published with full names in Latin and Thai script. No single doctor is designated 'ผู้ดำเนินการสถานพยาบาล' (responsible operator) and no licence numbers appear on the site.
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Doctors are shown with names, 'M.D.' titles and specialties, but no Medical Council of Thailand licence number (ว. …) is published for any of the seven on the Doctors or About pages.
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 1 · 6%
UNVERIFIED No formal accreditation (HA / JCI / AACI / ISO) is published for this standalone aesthetic clinic; what appears is standards language ('Gold Standard', 'FDA U.S. Standard', 'World Class') rather than an issuing accreditation body.
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED The operating brand 'Privato Clinic' and three Bangkok branches are named on the surface, but no registered operating company (บริษัท … จำกัด) or DBD number is published; a DBD/dataforthai search did not surface a confirmed Privato registration.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2 · 8%
UNVERIFIED No informed-consent, risk-disclosure, aftercare or terms document was located; the /privacy-policy/ and /en/contact-us/ pages both returned HTTP 404, and the footer carries no privacy/terms/consent link.
M7 · Advertising honesty 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Standards and superlative language is present ('leading aesthetic clinic in Bangkok', 'Gold Standard', 'FDA U.S. Standard', 'World Class') with an internal 10-vs-15-years experience inconsistency, but no explicit money-back guarantee and no 'No.1' / '#1' wording were found.
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Thai (default) plus a parallel English /en/ tree are offered, with transliteration drift between the Thai and /en/ doctor names, but a full per-locale comparison has not yet been run, so E1 is left unscored pending the locale-map pass. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The decision path is partly clear: seven doctors are named with focus areas and three branches are listed, but no single responsible operator is designated and the /en/contact-us/ page 404s, leaving the consult/aftercare route incomplete.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Public claims are moderately disciplined: standards language ('Gold Standard', 'FDA U.S. Standard', 'World Class') and a 10-vs-15-years inconsistency sit alongside testimonial results, but there is no explicit guarantee or 'No.1' claim.
Editorial verdict. A non-invasive aesthetic and laser clinic with a reasonably transparent roster: seven doctors named in Latin and Thai script, with the lead, Dr. Lerpong Krudngern, resolving in the TMC register as an active registered physician since 2003 (a generalist, not a board plastic surgeon). The open points are structural: no single designated responsible operator, no licence numbers, no facility accreditation (only 'Gold Standard' / 'FDA U.S. Standard' marketing language), no published legal entity, and thin patient documents (privacy and contact pages 404). The MOPH clinic-licence record resolved on 2026-07-11 — พรีวาโตคลินิกเวชกรรม is licensed at its Asoke (operating-licence 10101062662) and Silom (10101023465) addresses — so the record now ranks with no verification hold. The clinic has a right of reply.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.