Dossier · record
Samitivej Plastic & Esthetic Surgery Institute — Sukhumvit (Bangkok)
66TI /100
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4
Licence-number / credential disclosure 3
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 4
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 4
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 3
Advertising honesty 4
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 3
Public-claim sourcing discipline 3
responsible doctor(s) resolved in the TMC register (active registration) · 92% 🌐 www.samitivejhospitals.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-SAMITIVEJ · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4 · 10%
OFFICIAL The MOPH facility register returns the parent hospital โรงพยาบาลสมิติเวช สุขุมวิท at Soi Sukhumvit 49 (dossier address), op-licence 10201003064 — name and address match on 2026-07-11; the aesthetic institute operates inside this licensed hospital and publishes no separate number.
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4 · 24%
OFFICIAL The institute publishes individually-named, credentialed surgeons on own-site profile pages; Pichit Siriwan, M.D. (Diploma of the Thai Board of Plastic Surgery, Chulalongkorn, 1994) is TMC-confirmed as an active-registered board Plastic Surgeon (since 1986).
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Doctor profiles publish named board certifications with issuing institution and year (e.g. Thai Board of Plastic Surgery, Chulalongkorn, 1994), but individual Thai Medical Council licence (ว.) numbers are not displayed on the profiles.
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 4 · 6%
UNVERIFIED Hospital-wide facility accreditation: the institute page cites Samitivej Sukhumvit as a JCI-accredited hospital since 2007, and the About page names Thai HA (Hospital Accreditation Board of Thailand) — genuine facility accreditations, not doctor memberships.
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 4 · 8%
UNVERIFIED The operating company is clearly named — Samitivej Public Company Limited (Samitivej PCL) — part of the SET-listed Bangkok Dusit Medical Services PCL (BDMS) group.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED A substantive PDPA-style privacy / personal-data notice (retention, consent-withdrawal, DPO contact) is published; a dedicated public informed-consent / surgical-risk document was not surfaced on the crawled pages.
M7 · Advertising honesty 4 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Superlatives appear ('Bangkok's Best Cosmetic Surgery', 'World's Best Hospitals 2026'), but the 'international standard' claim is backed by real JCI/HA accreditation; no outcome guarantee or false-accreditation claim was found.
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The institute runs aligned EN and TH pages (same Sukhumvit + Srinakarin locations and positioning, neither publishing a licence number); a full EN/TH/中文 per-locale comparison is not yet closed, so this axis is left unscored. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — A workable decision path — named board-certified surgeons on own-site profile pages across the Sukhumvit and Srinakarin institute locations — though no single 'responsible physician / medical director' of the institute is explicitly labelled.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Public claims are mostly institution-backed (JCI/HA-supported 'international standard'), though comparative superlatives ('Best', 'World's Best Hospitals') are used as marketing alongside them.
Editorial verdict. A hospital-affiliated surgical institute inside JCI- and HA-accredited Samitivej, with individually-named board-certified surgeons on own-site profile pages — Pichit Siriwan, M.D. is TMC-confirmed as an active board plastic surgeon — and a clear operating entity (Samitivej PCL under the SET-listed BDMS group). The entry therefore sits in the hospital-affiliated, plastic-surgery and international-pathway segments. The open points are structural: the institute publishes no separate MOPH number (it operates inside the licensed hospital), individual Medical-Council ว. numbers are not shown on the profiles, and no dedicated public surgical-risk document was surfaced. Recorded with no verification hold; the right of reply remains open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.