Dossier · record
Wuttisak Clinic (วุฒิศักดิ์ คลินิก) — aesthetic chain (Bangkok)
—verification pending
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 2
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 1
Licence-number / credential disclosure 1
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 1
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 2
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 1
Advertising honesty 3
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 1
Public-claim sourcing discipline 1
the published doctor name was not resolved in the TMC register as of the date (verification hold — not a quality finding) verification hold · H3 🌐 www.wuttisakclinic.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-WUTTISAK · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 2 · 10%
OFFICIAL No MOPH / HSS clinic-registration number could be located; the brand's own site was down (HTTP 522) and the marketed domain parked / for sale as of 2026-07-11 (a search and availability limitation, not an absence of licence). A separate MOPH entry 'คลินิกแพทย์วุฒิศักดิ์เวชกรรมเฉพาะทาง' is a different solo clinic and is not treated as the chain's licence. · provisional
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 1 · 24%
UNVERIFIED No individually-named, credentialed responsible physician is visible on any verifiable first-party channel; the only physician ever individually named is the historical founder Dr Wuttisak Limpanich, with no published Medical Council number, and he is no longer the owner / operator following the 2020 business-rehabilitation filing.
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 1 · 12%
UNVERIFIED No Thai Medical Council licence numbers or per-doctor credential disclosures were located in any public source, and the own site was down so any on-site disclosure could not be verified. · provisional
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 1 · 6%
UNVERIFIED No hospital-accreditation (HA, JCI or AACI) claim was found; press describes staff / doctors trained overseas (training and marketing language, not accreditation), and on-site seals could not be inspected because the site was down. · provisional
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 2 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Multiple registered Wuttisak entities exist (Wuttisak Clinic Group PCL 0107553000018; Wuttisak Clinic Inter Group Co., Ltd. 0125555004451, reported as the current operator; WCI Holding PCL as the former listed parent), but only as secondary registry / press records, not surfaced on a working first-party page.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 1 · 8%
UNVERIFIED No Terms, informed-consent, risk-disclosure or Privacy page could be reached or confirmed because the own site was down (HTTP 522) as of 2026-07-11. · provisional
M7 · Advertising honesty 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED No current first-party advertising wording could be captured (site down; wuttisak.com parked), so present guarantee / superlative / FDA claims are not verifiable this pass; a 2013 joint regulatory case naming 'Nitipon–Wuttisak' is a historical record, not a current finding. · provisional
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The site locale set is not verifiable (the own site did not render); historically the brand was Thai-primary with an English corporate presence. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 1 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Decision-path clarity is not verifiable — no working first-party surface, no named responsible physician, and a franchise / mall-counter model, so a patient cannot identify who consults or who is accountable from a first-party channel.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 1 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — No first-party public claims could be sourced this pass (site down); the registry and press facts recorded here are third-party. · provisional
Editorial verdict. Wuttisak Clinic was once a market-leading chain; at this review its marketed domain was parked for sale and its brand site returned an origin-down error, so almost no first-party fact could be verified. No named, credentialed responsible physician is visible on any current first-party channel — only the historical founder is named in press, without a licence number, and he is no longer the operator. On that structural ground the entry is held (H3) and not ranked. This is a neutral statement about current verifiability, not an adverse finding; the operator's right of reply is open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.