Dossier · record
Interplast Clinic — Ploenchit & Rama 2 (Bangkok)
60TI /100
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability —
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4
Licence-number / credential disclosure 3
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 2
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2
Advertising honesty 4
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 4
Public-claim sourcing discipline 4
responsible doctor(s) resolved in the TMC register (active registration) · 82% verification hold · H1 🌐 interplastclinic.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-INTERPLAST · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability — · 10%
OFFICIAL The MOPH private-facility register was searched by name across the Thai transliterations อินเตอร์พลาส / อินเตอร์พลาสท์ / อินเตอร์พลาสต์ / อินเตอร์แพลส on 2026-07-11, and the clinic's exact licence record could not be isolated — it evidently does not register under an Interplast transliteration. A search/naming limitation, not an absence of licence: the responsible surgeon is TMC-confirmed (see M2) and the clinic operates openly at two Bangkok addresses. The record lists but stays provisional (not ranked) until the exact registered Thai facility name closes M1. · provisional
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 4 · 24%
OFFICIAL The responsible doctor resolves in the TMC register: Theerapong Poonyakariyagorn (นพ. ธีระพงษ์ ปุญญกริยากร), active registration since 1992, with TMC-certified board specialties in Surgery and Plastic Surgery — confirming the board claim published on the surgeon page. No Medical-Council licence number is printed on the clinic's own pages.
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Board-certification titles are listed (Thai Board of General Surgery 1998; Thai Board of Plastic Surgery 2000) plus society memberships (Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons of Thailand; ISAPS), but no Medical-Council licence number is published for Dr Theerapong or any other doctor.
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED No independent facility accreditation (HA / JCI / AACI) is claimed; only professional-society memberships are cited, which are memberships and not a facility accreditation.
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED The operating brand 'Interplast Clinic' and two Bangkok addresses are named on the surface; no registered operating company (บริษัท … จำกัด) or DBD number is published for independent legal-entity confirmation.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Instructional pages are published (Pre-Surgery Instructions, Recovery Instructions, MTF Healthy Eating Guidelines) and a Privacy Policy is linked in the footer, but no dedicated informed-consent or risk-disclosure page was surfaced.
M7 · Advertising honesty 4 · 12%
UNVERIFIED No 'best' / 'No.1' / guarantee / FDA / 'international standard' claims were detected; a volume figure ('over 20,000 cumulative cosmetic-surgery cases') and 'natural-looking' are used descriptively.
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — EN is the primary locale with no visible TH toggle on the crawled EN pages (Thai content lives on sister domains); a cross-front EN/TH/中文 comparison has not yet been run, so E1 is left unscored pending the locale-map pass. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 4 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The decision path is clear: the operating surgeon is named on a dedicated bio page, two Bangkok clinic addresses are published, and pre-surgery, recovery and dietary-guidance pages let a patient see who operates and find aftercare guidance.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 4 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Public claims are disciplined: no superlative, ranking, guarantee or FDA claim; the volume figure and 'natural-looking' language read as descriptive rather than promissory.
Editorial verdict. A standalone plastic-surgery clinic with a genuinely verifiable spine: the responsible surgeon, Dr. Theerapong Poonyakariyagorn, resolves in the TMC register as an active board plastic surgeon since 1992, and the advertising is among the more disciplined in the set (no superlative or guarantee claims). The open points are structural: no facility accreditation, no published legal entity or DBD number, no dedicated consent page, and — the reason this record does not yet rank — the MOPH clinic-licence number was not isolated under the Thai spellings tried as of 2026-07-11, which is a search limitation and not an absence of licence. The entry lists and stays provisional until an M1 retry closes. The clinic has a right of reply.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.