Dossier · record
The Metro Clinic (Metro Beauty Centers) — Ploenchit (Bangkok)
44TI /100
MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4
Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 3
Licence-number / credential disclosure 2
Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 2
Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3
Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2
Advertising honesty 3
EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency —
Decision-path clarity 3
Public-claim sourcing discipline 2
responsible doctor(s) resolved in the TMC register (active registration) · 92% verification hold · H1 🌐 metrobeautycenters.com ↗ · RECORD № BCL-METRO · data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
Measured · 80%
M1 · MOPH clinic-licence verifiability 4 · 10%
OFFICIAL The MOPH facility register returns เมโทรคลินิกเฉพาะทางด้านเวชกรรมศัลยกรรมตกแต่งและเสริมสร้างใบหน้า at Phetchaburi and Chidlom (Mercury Ville, Ploenchit area — dossier), op-licences 10102003262 and 10101014657 — name and address match on 2026-07-11; the number is not published on the clinic's own site.
M2 · Named responsible doctor + TMC registration 3 · 24%
OFFICIAL The clinic names its doctors individually rather than behind 'our team'; Peeraya Likitkiattikul, M.D. (Medical Council 55387) is TMC-confirmed as an active-registered physician (since 2017, a generalist — no surgical board). No single 'responsible/operating physician' is explicitly designated on the site.
M3 · Licence-number / credential disclosure 2 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Three team-page doctors publish Thai Medical Council numbers with education (Peeraya 55387, Tanatip 69136, Chanon 71901); a fourth roster-mentioned doctor carries no number, and Thai-script names are not published.
M4 · Independently verifiable facility accreditation (HA/JCI/AACI) 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED No facility accreditation (HA / JCI / AACI); the displayed items are manufacturer awards (Allergan, Merz, Galderma), a patient-review-platform award and a publisher 'clinic of the year' ranking — commercial recognitions, not accreditation.
M5 · Legal-entity traceability (DBD) 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED The operating company is named on the surface — Metro Beauty Centers Co., Ltd. (trading as The Metro Clinic) — with a named founder in a business/care-manager role (Renaud d'Hercourt); no company-registration number is published.
M6 · Patient documentary transparency (risks, consent, terms) 2 · 8%
UNVERIFIED A GDPR-framed Privacy Policy is published (data-protection only); no informed-consent, procedure-risk, refund or aftercare document was found, and the Terms link did not resolve during the crawl.
M7 · Advertising honesty 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED Superlative and unqualified claims appear across the site — 'best aesthetic clinic in Bangkok', 'finest plastic surgeon in Thailand', 'Simply the Best Botox service in Bangkok', '#1' — plus a device-approval claim ('approved by the FDA USA KDFA KGPM').
Editorial · 20%
E1 · EN/TH/中文 cross-front consistency — · 8%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The clinic states it serves English, Thai, Chinese, Japanese, French and Russian speakers; crawled content was English and Thai-script content was largely absent, so a full per-locale comparison is not yet closed and this axis is left unscored. · provisional
E2 · Decision-path clarity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Doctors are named with licence numbers and credentials, but the site does not designate a single responsible/operating physician and the founder role is a business (care-manager) title — a partly-clear decision path.
E3 · Public-claim sourcing discipline 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Public claims rely on unsourced superlatives ('best', 'finest', '#1') and on manufacturer/marketing awards used as trust signals rather than sourced, verifiable statements.
Editorial verdict. The clinic names its doctors individually with Thai Medical Council numbers, one of them (Peeraya Likitkiattikul) TMC-confirmed as an active-registered generalist, and its MOPH clinic registration matched the facility register on address. No TMC-confirmed board plastic surgeon sits in the accountable spine, so the entry belongs to the aesthetic/derma and international-pathway segments, not plastic surgery. Two points place a limited-clarification hold on the record: the advertising leans heavily on unqualified superlatives ('best', 'finest', '#1'), and no single responsible physician is designated on-site. The right of reply remains open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a procedure, a doctor's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the MOPH facility licence and the responsible doctor's TMC registration, the legal entity (Thai DBD), the doctor's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.